Radiomorphological signs and clinical severity of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7.

Objective: We aimed to assess the differences in the severity and chest-CT radiomorphological signs of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 and non-B.1.1.7 variants. Methods: We collected clinical data of consecutive patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and chest-CT imaging who were admitted to the Emergency Department between September 1- November 13, 2020 (non-B.1.1.7 cases) and March 1-March 18, 2021 (B.1.1.7 cases). We also examined the differences in the severity and radiomorphological features associated with COVID-19 pneumonia. Total pneumonia burden (%), mean attenuation of ground-glass opacities and consolidation were quantified using deep-learning research software. Results: The final population comprised 500 B.1.1.7 and 500 non-B.1.1.7 cases. Patients with B.1.1.7 infection were younger (58.5 ± 15.6 vs 64.8 ± 17.3; p < .001) and had less comorbidities. Total pneumonia burden was higher in the B.1.1.7 patient group (16.1% [interquartile range (IQR):6.0-34.2%] vs 6.6% [IQR:1.2-18.3%]; p < .001). In the age-specific analysis, in patients <60 years B.1.1.7 pneumonia had increased consolidation burden (0.1% [IQR:0.0-0.7%] vs 0.1% [IQR:0.0-0.2%]; p < .001), and severe COVID-19 was more prevalent (11.5% vs 4.9%; p = .032). Mortality rate was similar in all age groups. Conclusion: Despite B.1.1.7 patients were younger and had fewer comorbidities, they experienced more severe disease than non-B.1.1.7 patients, however, the risk of death was the same between the two groups. Advances in knowledge: Our study provides data on deep-learning based quantitative lung lesion burden and clinical outcomes of patients infected by B.1.1.7 VOC. Our findings might serve as a model for later investigations, as new variants are emerging across the globe.

Alsó légúti minták molekuláris mikrobiológiai vizsgálata a koronavírus-járvány idoszakában.

INTRODUCTION: BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus Panel (bioMérieux) is a PCR method for microbiological diagnostics of lower respiratory infections. It can detect 18 bacteria, 9 viruses and 7 antibiotic resistance genes in real time. It can help the differential diagnosis and the choice of therapy of pneumonia, by giving results in two hours. OBJECTIVE: Reviewing the results of pneumonia PCR tests performed in our laboratory, and comparing them with the results of conventional culturing. METHOD: From October 2020 to September 2021, 820 lower respiratory tract samples were analyzed from inpatients with suspected pneumonia. Beside the PCR test, culturing was also performed. Oropharyngeal swabs were used for supplementary SARS-CoV-2 PCR. RESULTS: 40% of samples were collected from SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. In 60% of the samples, the PCR test detected pathogens or resistance genes. The most commonly detected pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii. 44% of the bacteria detected by PCR were not verified by culturing, whereas by culturing, several other bacteria, fungi and antibiotic resistance mechanisms were detected, which were not shown in the results of the multiplex PCR tests. In SARS-CoV-2-positive inpatients, 25.8% of the detected bacteria was S. aureus. The most common resistance gene was mecA/C (MRSA). In this group, other respiratory virus genes were detected in 2% of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, whereas in 13% in samples of SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the importance of pathogens excluded from the PCR targets and multifactorial mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, culturing is recommended to perform beside pneumonia-specific multiplex PCR tests. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(33): 1295-1302.

The diagnostic value of rapid anti IgM and IgG detecting tests in the identification of patients with SARS CoV-2 virus infection / [A specifikus IgM- és IgG-antitesteket detektáló gyorstesztek értéke a SARS CoV-2 vírusfertozés kimutatásában (A COVID-19-pandémia orvosszakmai kérdései)]

Introduction: At the end of March, 2020, rapid tests detecting the presence of antiviral IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 virus were introduced in Hungary for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19 disease). Aim: We evaluated two rapid tests (Anhui and Clungene) in comparison with those of real-time PCR tests considered as the gold standard in the detection of infection. Method: Between 16, March and 14, April, 2020, we performed rapid IgM and IgG detecting tests without PCR; PCR without rapid tests; and PCR WITH rapid tests in 4140, 3210 and 1654 patients, respectively. (Out of these 1654 patients, Anhui and Clungene tests were used for testing in 625 and 1029 patients, respectively.) Patients were considered as positive in PCR and rapid tests when PCR positivity and IgM or IgG positivity occurred at any time, respectively. (Note: Clungene test is also marketed as 'Lungene'.) Results: The prevalence of PCR positivity in 4864 patients tested with PCR was 6.3%. The sensitivity and specificity of Anhui and Clungene tests were 33.3% and 72.85%, and 35.48% and 85.02%, respectively. At 6% PCR positivity, the positive and negative predictive values of Anhui and Clungene were 7.28%, 94.48%, 13.13%, and 95.38%, respectively. Conclusion: The low positive predictive values indicate that Anhui and Clungene rapid tests detecting the presence of anti-IgM and anti-IgG against SARS-CoV-2 virus infection are not suitable for screening SARS-CoV-2 vírus infection in the general population. These results strongly support that Anhui and Clungene rapid tests detecting IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 virus should not be used in the differential diagnosis of infection. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(20): 807-812.

Radiomorphological signs and clinical severity of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7

Objective: We aimed to assess the differences in the severity and chest-CT radiomorphological signs of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 and non-B.1.1.7 variants. Methods: We collected clinical data of consecutive patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and chest-CT imaging who were admitted to the Emergency Department between September 1– November 13, 2020 (non-B.1.1.7 cases) and March 1–March 18, 2021 (B.1.1.7 cases). We also examined the differences in the severity and radiomorphological features associated with COVID-19 pneumonia. Total pneumonia burden (%), mean attenuation of ground-glass opacities and consolidation were quantified using deep-learning research software. Results: The final population comprised 500 B.1.1.7 and 500 non-B.1.1.7 cases. Patients with B.1.1.7 infection were younger (58.5 ± 15.6 vs 64.8 ± 17.3;p < .001) and had less comorbidities. Total pneumonia burden was higher in the B.1.1.7 patient group (16.1% [interquartile range (IQR):6.0–34.2%] vs 6.6% [IQR:1.2–18.3%];p < .001). In the age-specific analysis, in patients <60 years B.1.1.7 pneumonia had increased consolidation burden (0.1% [IQR:0.0–0.7%] vs 0.1% [IQR:0.0–0.2%];p < .001), and severe COVID-19 was more prevalent (11.5% vs  4.9%;p = .032). Mortality rate was similar in all age groups. Conclusion: Despite B.1.1.7 patients were younger and had fewer comorbidities, they experienced more severe disease than non-B.1.1.7 patients, however, the risk of death was the same between the two groups. Advances in knowledge: Our study provides data on deep-learning based quantitative lung lesion burden and clinical outcomes of patients infected by B.1.1.7 VOC. Our findings might serve as a model for later investigations, as new variants are emerging across the globe.

EDTA-Induced Pseudothrombocytopenia up to 9 Months after Initial COVID-19 Infection Associated with Persistent Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG Seropositivity.

Platelets have a role in vascular complications of COVID-19-related viral coagulopathy. Although immune-induced thrombocytopenia has been described mostly in moderate-to-severe COVID-19, the prognostic role of platelet count in COVID-19 is still controversial. Pseudothrombocytopenia has been reported to represent COVID-19-associated coagulopathy in critical illness, and transient EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia lasting less than 3 weeks was described in a patient with severe acute COVID-19 pneumonia. In our case study, EDTA-induced pseudothrombocytopenia was still present at 9 months after an initial SARS-CoV-2 virus infection in an apparently recovered 60 year old man. The persistence of antinucleocapside and antispike antibodies 9 months after the initial infection suggests that EDTA-induced pseudothrombocytopenia may be related to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG or IgM antibodies. We should acknowledge the possibility that pseudothrombocytopenia may also appear in some patients after seroconversion after the launch of large-scale vaccination programs.

Comparison of virus neutralization activity and results of 10 different anti-SARS-CoV-2 serological tests in COVID-19 recovered plasma donors.

Serological testing is a tool to predict protection against later infection. This potential heavily relies on antibody levels showing acceptable agreement with gold standard virus neutralization tests. The aim of our study was to investigate diagnostic value of the available serological tests in terms of predicting virus neutralizing activity of serum samples drawn 5-7 weeks after onset of symptoms from 101 donors with a history of COVID-19. Immune responses against Receptor Binding Domain (RBD), Spike1 and 2 proteins and Nucleocapsid antigens were measured by various ELISA tests. Neutralizing antibody activity in serum samples was assessed by a cell-based virus neutralization test. Spearman correlation coefficients between serological and neutralization results ranged from 0.41 to 0.91 indicating moderate to strong correlation between ELISA test results and virus neutralization. The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA tests in the prediction of neutralization were 35-100% and 35-90% respectively. No clear cut off levels can be established that would reliably indicate neutralization activity. For some tests, however, a value below which the sample is not expected to neutralize can be established. Our data suggests that several of the ELISA kits tested may be suitable for epidemiological surveys 1-2 months after the infection, estimating whether a person may have recently exposed to the virus. Sensitivities considerably superseding specificity at the cut-off values proposed by the manufacturers suggest greater potential in the identification of insufficient antibody responses than in confirming protection. Nevertheless, the former might be important in assessing response to vaccination and characterizing therapeutic plasma preparations.